![]() ![]() EAM is a product I would love to love but right now I believe Bullguard does a better job. BITDEFENDER SCANNER STUCK LICENSEI bought a two year license almost exactly two years ago but there was no way I was going to renew. Don't get me wrong, EAM detection is fantastic! Personally, EAM is still too heavy for me (I hate slow boot times in particular) and again there are too many FP's. Detection is great with almost no FP's and it runs very light on my rig. All I said was in my opinion, of all the AV's that incorporate the BD engine, Bullguard has done the best job. Emsisoft has been promising to lower FP's for a long time and you can't blame Ikarus anymore. Now that you have switched over to BD you guys have no excuses for the number of FP's because we know BD doesn't throw them up by the bushel. Myself, I liked the detection Ikarus brought to the table and I think they took too much of the blame for high FP's. ![]() That makes sense if Ikarus was the main clulpret. My point is you guys laid much blame for the FP issue with the Ikarus engine so it was changed to Bitdefender. ![]() How many AV products have changed radically over the past two years? For good and bad. This issue has also been acknowledged by AVC in the dedicated false positive report by the way:įabian, I really don't care about two years ago. Other products had the benefit to encounter these files and fix the false positives they caused over a longer period of time, so even though they may have had the same false positives than we did, theirs were spread out over a bigger period of time. So essentially when you take part in this kind of test for the first time, you are confronted with a huge collection of files at once. BITDEFENDER SCANNER STUCK PCThey have been harvesting FTP servers, PC Magazine cover DVDs and download portals for almost 10 years now. Last but not least also take into account how AVC actually comes up with the false positive test sets. We’d prefer to see digital identity protection. A competent antivirus suite with a wide array of features to meet most users’ needs. If you don't want to do the math yourself, take a look at Neil Rubenking's article about the false positive ranking when taking the AVC weightings in account. Bitdefender Total Security is what it’s always been. Personally I would argue that one false positive in a Windows file has more catastrophic consequences than 38 false positives in files that are partially so old and thinly spread that even an enormous service like VirusTotal hasn't seen them even once. When you look at the actual false positives in the dedicated false positive report (link can be found in the test report) you will see that a significant portion of the false positives were in rather exotic files (we are talking applications designed for Windows 98 here). Click to expand.Actually you have to take that 38 false positives with a grain of salt. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |